The ecosystem services concept: a new Esperanto to facilitate participatory planning processes?

dc.contributor.authorSpyra, Marcin
dc.contributor.authorKleemann, Janina
dc.contributor.authorCetin, Nuket Ipek
dc.contributor.authorVazquez Navarrete, Cesar Jesus
dc.contributor.authorAlbert, Christian
dc.contributor.authorPalacios-Agundez, Igone
dc.contributor.authorAmetzaga-Arregi, Ibone
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-29T11:31:18Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentGebze Teknik Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractContextSeveral case studies investigated the role of ecosystem services in participatory planning processes. However, no systematic study exists that cuts across a large number of empirical cases to identify the implications of using ecosystem services in participatory planning.ObjectivesThis study explores the potential of the ecosystem services concept to act as a boundary concept (new Esperanto) to facilitate the integration of actors' perceptions and objectives into planning goals.MethodsWe analyzed eleven case studies to explore how the ecosystem services concept has been operationalized to support participatory planning processes, and to identify lessons from successful applications. We characterized the case studies according to contextual and methodological criteria. Each case study was assessed through a codified score card method in order to detect success or failure criteria in using the ecosystem services concept in participatory planning. We compared the case study criteria with the results of the balanced score card method.ResultsWe identified several positive effects of applying the ecosystem services concept in participatory planning, including the facilitation of knowledge sharing and consideration of local experiences, the support towards a shared vision, and the increased awareness among local actors concerning their role as ecosystem services suppliers or beneficiaries. Among the drawbacks, we identified the risk of overemphasizing specific ecosystem goods or services during the process.ConclusionsWe conclude by providing some recommendations to enhance future practice related to issues such as communication, use of local knowledge and integration of ecosystem services in existing legal instruments.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10980-018-0745-6
dc.identifier.endpage1735
dc.identifier.issn0921-2973
dc.identifier.issn1572-9761
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0683-1190
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1672-6087
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7491-8461
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3975-1405
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1071-6232
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2591-4779
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6316-6209
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85057947466
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1715
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0745-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14854/11963
dc.identifier.volume34
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000478084800015
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofLandscape Ecology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20251020
dc.subjectCase studies
dc.subjectComparative analysis
dc.subjectEcosystem services
dc.subjectLandscape planning
dc.subjectParticipatory planning
dc.subjectStakeholders
dc.titleThe ecosystem services concept: a new Esperanto to facilitate participatory planning processes?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar