The Power of Financial Incentives versus the Power of Suggestion for Individual Pension: Are Financial Incentives or Automatic Enrollment Policies More Effective?

dc.contributor.authorYanikkaya, Halit
dc.contributor.authorKoral, Zeynep Aktas
dc.contributor.authorCitci, Sadettin Haluk
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-29T11:08:42Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentFakülteler, İşletme Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümü
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates and compares the impacts of two important reforms in retirement savings-matching contribution and automatic enrollment-on participation in the individual pension system (IPS) in Turkey by using a dataset containing information about over 40 million pension contracts for the period of 2004-2021. Unlike the automatic enrollment system (AES), the state matching contribution policy imposes a burden on the state's budget; understanding the relative effectiveness of the two policies can help protect the public budget from such burdens, especially by taking individual attitudes into account in future policy recommendations. Our estimations indicate that both reforms led to an overall increase in participation. However, the AES is not efficient at encouraging participants to make an active decision on plan characteristics, such as portfolio choices. We also evaluate the effects of the two reforms on IPS participation among different demographic groups. We find that males and married individuals are more responsive to matching contributions, and education levels seem to be closely related with IPS participation. Participants are also sensitive to both the returns of pension funds and alternative investment instruments. All the findings imply that individuals must be encouraged to recognize the need for effective financial preparation in their post-retirement lives. To accomplish this, policymakers could utilize a comprehensive informative campaign and workplace seminars about both the system as a whole and the returns, and they could improve the plan characteristics to be compatible with the needs of individuals before retirement as well as after.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su15043652
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3755-3464
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1542-0174
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85149337943
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su15043652
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14854/5468
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000941212600001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMdpi
dc.relation.ispartofSustainability
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20251020
dc.subjectindividual pension system
dc.subjectautomatic enrollment
dc.subjectmatching contribution
dc.titleThe Power of Financial Incentives versus the Power of Suggestion for Individual Pension: Are Financial Incentives or Automatic Enrollment Policies More Effective?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar