Treatment and operating cost analysis of metalworking wastewaters by a continuous electrocoagulation reactor
| dc.contributor.author | Kobya, Mehmet | |
| dc.contributor.author | Omwene, Philip Isaac | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ukundimana, Zubeda | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-29T11:26:53Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
| dc.department | Fakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümü | |
| dc.description.abstract | Environmental pollution is a persistent global challenge of industrialisation. In this study, metalworking wastewater (MWW) containing COD of 17,312 mg/L, TOC of 3155 mg/L and turbidity of 15,350 NTU was treated by continuous electrocoagulation process (CEP). At current densities between 30-90 A/m(2), and reactor retention time (tau) of 35 min (Q = 0.10 L/min), removal efficiencies for COD, TOC and turbidity were 68.0-87.0%, 55.2-77.7% and 85.0-99.6%, respectively for Al electrode. Whereas removals for COD, TOC and turbidity with Fe electrode were 75.1-94.8%, 72.2-89.5% and 88.1-99.9%, respectively. Futheremore, varying flow rate from 0.010-0.20 L/min (tau of 350-17.5 min) at 90 A/m(2), resulted into COD, TOC and turbidity removals of 92.6-71.3%, 83.3-64.9% and 99.9-88.9% for Al electrode and 97.8-78.6%, 94.9-69.9% and 99.9-94.7%, respectively for Fe electrode. Analysis of operating costs (OC) encompassing consumptions of energy, electrodes, chemicals and landfill disposal of generated sludge for 30-90 A/m(2) current density showed a variation from 1.37 to 4.74 $/m(3) and 1.03-3.80 $/m(3) for Al and Fe electrodes, respectively. Similarly, the OC for 0.010-0.20 L/min flow rates were 4.34-4.88 $/m(3) (3.34-1.11 $/kg COD) and 3.58-3.85 $/m(3) (7.73-1.41 $/kg COD) for Al and Fe electrodes, respectively. At optimum conditions (EC time = 40 min, tau = 70 min, and 90 A/m(2)), COD, TOC and turbidity removals from MWW by CEP were 94.3%, 90.1% and 99.3%, respectively with Fe electrodes. At these optimums, the OC was 3.09 US $/m(3) (2.63 US $/kg removed COD). The results showed that CEP was an effective alternative process for treatment of the MWW. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | TUBITAK | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This study was funded by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) through project number104Y267. The authors thank TUBITAK for the financial support towards this work. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103526 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2213-2929 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2213-3437 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 2 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85076554067 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103526 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14854/10473 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 8 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000524743700120 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier Sci Ltd | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_WOS_20251020 | |
| dc.subject | Continuous electrocoagulation | |
| dc.subject | Metalworking wastewater | |
| dc.subject | Operating cost | |
| dc.title | Treatment and operating cost analysis of metalworking wastewaters by a continuous electrocoagulation reactor | |
| dc.type | Article |








