Optimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling of single-domed historical masonry buildings

dc.contributor.authorAkturk, Fuat
dc.contributor.authorYesilyurt, Ali
dc.contributor.authorÇakır, Ferit
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-29T11:27:56Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, İnşaat Bölümü
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to identify the optimal intensity measures for use in probabilistic seismic demand models for single-domed historical masonry buildings. Developing a probabilistic seismic demand model that describes the relationship between strong ground motion intensity measures and engineering demand parameters is critical in the performance-based earthquake engineering framework. To this end, a methodology is presented for selecting optimal intensity measures based on correlation, efficiency, practicality, proficiency, and sufficiency criteria. The 38 intensity measures commonly used in seismic vulnerability and risk assessments are categorized as follows: (i) earthquake-based, (ii) structure-based, (iii) event-based, and (iv) compound-based. Shear Stress, Normal Stress, Maximum Normal Strain, and Maximum Drift Ratio were used as engineering demand parameters to measure the structural response. In this study, the Elbistan Ulu Mosque, which was damaged after February 6, 2023, Mw7.8 and Mw7.5 Kahramanmaras earthquakes, was selected as a case study to determine the appropriate intensity parameters. For this purpose, response spectrum analyses were conducted on a 3D finite element model of the selected historical masonry structure to assess its response under seismic events. Various probabilistic seismic demand models were developed, and numerous regression analyses were performed between the engineering demand parameter and the intensity measures. After conducting thorough analysis and evaluation, spectral acceleration, spectral displacement, and modified cordova intensity were determined to be the most suitable intensity measure parameters. In addition to these optimal intensity measures, fragility curves were subsequently developed based on other relevant intensity measures, including peak ground acceleration, effective design acceleration, and A95.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109378
dc.identifier.issn1350-6307
dc.identifier.issn1873-1961
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9641-2004
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5880-7144
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85217416837
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109378
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14854/10969
dc.identifier.volume171
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001426714500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofEngineering Failure Analysis
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20251020
dc.subjectOptimal intensity measure
dc.subjectFragility curve
dc.subjectSeismic vulnerability assessment
dc.subjectFinite element analysis
dc.subjectSingle-domed historical masonry buildings
dc.titleOptimal intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling of single-domed historical masonry buildings
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar