A Comparative Analysis of Black-Box and Glass-Box Models for Poplar Plantation Mapping with Remote Sensing Data

dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Muhammed Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorColkesen, Ismail
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-29T12:10:07Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentGebze Teknik Üniversitesi
dc.description2025 EARSeL and DGPF Joint Istanbul Workshop on Topographic Mapping from Space -- Istanbul -- 209677
dc.description.abstractPoplar trees are essential for industrial afforestation applications due to their globally recognized plantation practices, reputation, ability to produce a large quantity of raw material in a short time, diverse applications in wood production, suitability for hybridisation and breeding implementations, and the availability of various species and clones adapted to the soil and climate conditions. Accurate identification and mapping of poplar afforestation areas are therefore crucial for planners and decision-makers to manage inventory records and maximize economic value. In this study, the poplar tree mapping and feature selection performances of the glass-box Explainable Boosting Machine (EBM) algorithm were investigated using satellite images having different resolutions (i.e., Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope) and texture features. A robust black-box algorithm, XGBoost, was utilized as a benchmark algorithm to compare the performance of EBM. The results showed that the EBM algorithm outperformed the standard XGBoost algorithm by up to 2% in classifying poplar trees when both spectral bands and calculated texture features were used, for both satellite images. Additionally, using the high spatial resolution PlanetScope imagery resulted in a significant decrease in the classification accuracy of popular areas (about %10) compared to Sentinel-2 imagery. The study also assessed the most important features influencing the classification process. For this, while 15 features were selected employing the visual charts provided by EBM for interpreting the decision-making process, the SHAP technique was applied to examine the most prominent features in the XGBoost model structure. In this scenario, EBM and XGBoost presented greater performances for both satellite data compared. These findings emphasize EBM's consistent superiority, indicating that its enhanced interpretability can facilitate more precise feature selection and model refinement, particularly for Sentinel-2 imagery. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-6-2025-227-2025
dc.identifier.endpage231
dc.identifier.isbn9781629935126
dc.identifier.isbn9781629934297
dc.identifier.isbn9781629935201
dc.identifier.issn1682-1750
dc.identifier.issueM-6-2025
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105009028815
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage227
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-6-2025-227-2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14854/14959
dc.identifier.volume48
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInternational Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20251020
dc.subjectExplainable Boosting Machine
dc.subjectFeature Selection
dc.subjectGlass-box
dc.subjectPoplar
dc.subjectSHAP
dc.subjectXGBoost
dc.titleA Comparative Analysis of Black-Box and Glass-Box Models for Poplar Plantation Mapping with Remote Sensing Data
dc.typeConference Object

Dosyalar