The faulty SOS response of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 stems from an inefficient RecA-LexA interplay
| dc.contributor.author | Akkaya, Ozlem | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aparicio, Tomas | |
| dc.contributor.author | Perez-Pantoja, Danilo | |
| dc.contributor.author | de Lorenzo, Victor | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-29T11:13:46Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.department | Fakülteler, Temel Bilimler Fakültesi, Moleküler Biyoloji ve Genetik Bölümü | |
| dc.description.abstract | Despite its environmental robustness Pseudomonas putida strain KT2440 is very sensitive to DNA damage and displays poor homologous recombination efficiencies. To gain an insight into this deficiency isogenic increment recA and increment lexA1 derivatives of prophage-free strain P. putida EM173 were generated and responses of the recA and lexA1 promoters to DNA damage tested with GFP reporter technology. Basal expression of recA and lexA1 of P. putida were high in the absence of DNA damage and only moderately induced by norfloxacin. A similar behaviour was observed when equivalent GFP fusions to the recA and lexA promoters of E. coli were placed in P. putida EM173. In contrast, all SOS promoters were subject to strong repression in E. coli, which was released only when cells were treated with the antibiotic. Replacement of P. putida's native LexA1 and RecA by E. coli homologues did not improve the responsiveness of the indigenous functions to DNA damage. Taken together, it seems that P. putida fails to mount a strong SOS response due to the inefficacy of the crucial RecA-LexA interplay largely tractable to the weakness of the corresponding promoters and the inability of the repressor to shut them down entirely in the absence of DNA damage. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | SETH (MINECO/FEDER) [RTI2018-095584-B-C42] | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | European Union [H2020-FET-OPEN-RIA-2017-1-766975, H2020-NMBP-BIO-CSA-2018-820699, H2020-NMBP-TR-IND/H2020-NMBP-BIO-2018-814650, MIX-UP H2020-BIO-CN-2019-870294] | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Comunidad de Madrid - European Structural and Investment Funds - (FSE, FECER) [S2017/BMD-3691] | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | TUBITAK-BIDEP through the International Postdoctoral Research Scholarship Programme (Programme 2219) | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Chilean government [ANID PIA/Anillo ACT172128, ANID PIA/BASAL FB0002, FONDECYT 1201741] | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | SyCoLiM Project of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [ERA-COBIOTECH 2018 - PCI2019-111859-2] | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Authors are indebted to Pablo I. Nikel for most valuable advice and conceptual input throughout the development of this Project. This work was funded by the SETH (RTI2018-095584-B-C42) (MINECO/FEDER), SyCoLiM (ERA-COBIOTECH 2018 - PCI2019-111859-2) Project of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. MADONNA (H2020-FET-OPEN-RIA-2017-1-766975), BioRoboost (H2020-NMBP-BIO-CSA-2018-820699), SynBio4Flav (H2020-NMBP-TR-IND/H2020-NMBP-BIO-2018-814650) and MIX-UP (MIX-UP H2020-BIO-CN-2019-870294), Contracts of the European Union and the InGEMICS-CM (S2017/BMD-3691), Project of the Comunidad de Madrid - European Structural and Investment Funds - (FSE, FECER). o.A. was supported by TUBITAK-BIDEP through the International Postdoctoral Research Scholarship Programme (Programme 2219). D.P.-P. also thanks the support of Chilean government through Grants ANID PIA/Anillo ACT172128, ANID PIA/BASAL FB0002 and FONDECYT 1201741. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1462-2920.15384 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 1619 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1462-2912 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1462-2920 | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-0133-0461 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-0478-1417 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-5720-2162 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-6041-2731 | |
| dc.identifier.pmid | 33393180 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85099363978 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 1608 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15384 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14854/6918 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 23 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000607304100001 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q2 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Wiley | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Environmental Microbiology | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_WOS_20251020 | |
| dc.subject | Gram-Negative Bacteria | |
| dc.subject | Dna-Damage | |
| dc.subject | Cleavage | |
| dc.subject | Protein | |
| dc.subject | Repair | |
| dc.subject | Genes | |
| dc.subject | Tools | |
| dc.title | The faulty SOS response of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 stems from an inefficient RecA-LexA interplay | |
| dc.type | Article |








