An assessment of the effectiveness of a rotation forest ensemble for land-use and land-cover mapping

Abstract

Increasing the accuracy of thematic maps produced through the process of image classification has been a hot topic in remote sensing. For this aim, various strategies, classifiers, improvements, and their combinations have been suggested in the literature. Ensembles that combine the prediction of individual classifiers with weights based on the estimated prediction accuracies are strategies aiming to improve the classifier performances. One of the recently introduced ensembles is the rotation forest, which is based on the idea of building accurate and diverse classifiers by applying feature extraction to the training sets and then reconstructing new training sets for each classifier. In this study, the effectiveness of the rotation forest was investigated for decision trees in land-use and land-cover (LULC) mapping, and its performance was compared with performances of the six most widely used ensemble methods. The results were verified for the effectiveness of the rotation forest ensemble as it produced the highest classification accuracies for the selected satellite data. When the statistical significance of differences in performances was analysed using McNemar's tests based on normal and chi-squared distributions, it was found that the rotation forest method outperformed the bagging, Diverse Ensemble Creation by Oppositional Relabelling of Artificial Training Examples (DECORATE), and random subspace methods, whereas the performance differences with the other ensembles were statistically insignificant.