Parameterized complexity of finding a spanning tree with minimum reload cost diameter [2]

dc.contributor.authorBaste, Julien
dc.contributor.authorGözüpek, Didem
dc.contributor.authorPaul, Christophe A.H.
dc.contributor.authorSau, Ignasi
dc.contributor.authorShalom, Mordechai
dc.contributor.authorThilikos, Dimitrios M.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-29T12:10:03Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Bilgisayar Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.description12th International Symposium on Parameterized and Exact Computation, IPEC 2017 -- Vienna -- 134977
dc.description.abstractWe study the minimum diameter spanning tree problem under the reload cost model (Diameter-Tree for short) introduced by Wirth and Steffan (2001). In this problem, given an undirected edge-colored graph G, reload costs on a path arise at a node where the path uses consecutive edges of different colors. The objective is to find a spanning tree of G of minimum diameter with respect to the reload costs. We initiate a systematic study of the parameterized complexity of the Diameter-Tree problem by considering the following parameters: the cost of a solution, and the treewidth and the maximum degree ? of the input graph. We prove that Diameter-Tree is para-NP-hard for any combination of two of these three parameters, and that it is FPT parameterized by the three of them. We also prove that the problem can be solved in polynomial time on cactus graphs. This result is somehow surprising since we prove Diameter-Tree to be NP-hard on graphs of treewidth two, which is best possible as the problem can be trivially solved on forests. When the reload costs satisfy the triangle inequality, Wirth and Steffan (2001) proved that the problem can be solved in polynomial time on graphs with ? = 3, and Galbiati (2008) proved that it is NP-hard if ? = 4. Our results show, in particular, that without the requirement of the triangle inequality, the problem is NP-hard if ? = 3, which is also best possible. Finally, in the case where the reload costs are polynomially bounded by the size of the input graph, we prove that Diameter-Tree is in XP and W[1]-hard parameterized by the treewidth plus ?. © 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2017.3
dc.identifier.isbn9783959773782
dc.identifier.isbn9783959773867
dc.identifier.isbn9783959773898
dc.identifier.isbn9783959773720
dc.identifier.isbn9783959771542
dc.identifier.isbn9783959770460
dc.identifier.isbn9783939897385
dc.identifier.isbn9783959770767
dc.identifier.isbn9783959773089
dc.identifier.isbn9783959771153
dc.identifier.issn1868-8969
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85044784386
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.IPEC.2017.3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14854/14932
dc.identifier.volume89
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSchloss Dagstuhl- Leibniz-Zentrum fur Informatik GmbH, Dagstuhl Publishing
dc.relation.ispartofLeibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, LIPIcs
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20251020
dc.subjectDynamic programming
dc.subjectFPT algorithm
dc.subjectMinimum diameter spanning tree
dc.subjectParameterized complexity
dc.subjectReload cost problems
dc.subjectTreewidth
dc.titleParameterized complexity of finding a spanning tree with minimum reload cost diameter [2]
dc.typeConference Object

Dosyalar