Lessons learned from implementing the ecosystem services concept in urban planning
| dc.contributor.author | Grunewald, K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bastian, O. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Louda, J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arcidiacono, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Brzoska, P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bue, M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cetin, N., I | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-29T11:28:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
| dc.department | Gebze Teknik Üniversitesi | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper presents a summary of lessons learned from implementing the ecosystem services (ES) approach into urban planning practice in different European urban settings. We summarise a survey co-created with, and presented to, researchers and end-users in city administrations from ten European case study cities. To complement the expert analysis, 14 semi-structured interviews were conducted among stakeholders to assess the use of ES in practice in urban settings. There was strong agreement between scientists and practitioners on both the opportunities and the barriers to uptake the ES concept in urban planning practice. Key agreements were that the ES concept supports decision-making as well as spatial planning, it is most useful as a communication tool, and monetarisation and public pressure can be considered as promoting factors. Barriers are lack of evidence including case studies, standardised methods and criteria to evaluate nature and its benefits, lack of legislations/ reform, limited capacity and reluctance to apply ES in planning practice, and limited public involvement. On individual aspects, such as the monetarisation of ES, views differed both among the scientists and the practitioners. Derived from our investigations we summarize in which circumstances the ES concept is most relevant and useful for urban planners and decision-makers. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | project BIDELIN The values of ecosystem services, biodiversity and greenblue infrastructure in cities using the examples of Dresden, Liberec and Decin - European fund for regional development for regional development (Interreg V-A 2014-2020 Saxony-Czech [100282320] | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | BIDELIN project | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | research project OdSKKIP (Ecosystem Services of Urban Regions - Mapping, Communicating and Integrating into Planning to conserve biodiversity during a changing climate) - German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [FKZ 16LC1604B] | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | EU Horizon 2020project REGREEN [821016] | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | project Smart City - Smart Region - Smart Community - Operational Programme Research, Development and Education ofthe Czech Republic [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007435] | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | project Economic and Institutional Aspects of Planning and Implementation Nature Based Adaptation Solutions [UJEPIGAJR2021450082] | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | project ENABLE through the 2015-2016 BiodivERsA COFUND call for research proposals | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences, and Spatial Planning | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Swedish Environmental Protection Agency | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | German aeronautics and space research centre | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Research Council of Norway | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | National Science Centre (Poland) | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [821016] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Lenka Dubova's research was supported by project BIDELIN The values of ecosystem services, biodiversity and greenblue infrastructure in cities using the examples of Dresden, Liberec and Decin (Grant No. 100282320) , financed by European fund for regional development (Interreg V-A 2014-2020 Saxony-Czech Republic) . The work of Olaf Bastian, Patrycia Brzoska and Karsten Grunewald was also supported by the BIDELIN project (http://bidelin.ioer.eu/en/project/) . Claudia Dworczyk's research was supported by research project OdSKKIP (Ecosystem Services of Urban Regions - Mapping, Communicating and Integrating into Planning to conserve biodiversity during a changing climate) funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under the funding code FKZ 16LC1604B. Laurence Jones was supported by the EU Horizon 2020project REGREEN (Grant Agreement No. 821016) . Jiri Louda's research was supported by project Smart City - Smart Region - Smart Community financed by the Operational Programme Research, Development and Education ofthe Czech Republic - Grant no. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007435 and project Economic and Institutional Aspects of Planning and Implementation Nature Based Adaptation Solutions (UJEPIGAJR2021450082) . Daria Sikorska's research was supported as part of the project ENABLE, funded through the 2015-2016 BiodivERsA COFUND call for research proposals, with the national funders The Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences, and Spatial Planning, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, German aeronautics and space research centre, National Science Centre (Poland) , The Research Council of Norway and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101273 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2212-0416 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-2906-7009 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-8752-6245 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-5068-076X | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0001-7194-3178 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-8141-8112 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-0291-5066 | |
| dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-4379-9006 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85104645162 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101273 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14854/11010 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 49 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000663762100004 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Ecosystem Services | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.snmz | KA_WOS_20251020 | |
| dc.subject | Decision-making | |
| dc.subject | Green-blue infrastructure | |
| dc.subject | Practitioners' perspective | |
| dc.subject | Scientists' perspective | |
| dc.subject | Urban nature | |
| dc.title | Lessons learned from implementing the ecosystem services concept in urban planning | |
| dc.type | Article |








