Electro-Peroxone Treatment of Phenol: Process Comparison, the Effect of Operational Parameters and Degradation Mechanism

dc.contributor.authorTurkay, Ozge
dc.contributor.authorBarisci, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Bahar
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Hazal
dc.contributor.authorDimoglo, Anatoli
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-29T11:13:03Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.description.abstractThe degradation of phenol by novel electro-peroxone (E-peroxone) was investigated in this study. In the first stage of the work, different cathode materials (carbon-PTFE, bronze doped carbon-PTFE and stainless steel) and experimental conditions (i.e. inlet ozone concentration) were evaluated for H2O2 generation. All cathode materials apart from stainless steel generated high amount of H2O2 within 10 min. However, when two carbon-PTFE were used as cathodes, the production rate was faster than the usage of one carbon-PTFE cathode. The production capacity of H2O2 and center dot OH radical in the E-peroxone, ozonation and electrooxidation (EOX) processes were presented comparatively. While high concentration of center dot OH radical was generated in both ozonation and E-peroxone processes from the first min, there was no center dot OH radical production in EOX. While the phenol degradation rate was noticeably low in EOX, E-peroxone process provided complete degradation of phenol. The removal rate was also high in ozonation but it was slower than E-peroxone. Transformation by-products were identified by HPLC. The E-peroxone process leads to the formation of aromatic compounds such as p-benzoquinone, hydroquinone and pyro-catechol, and aliphatic carboxylic acids, mostly oxalic acid and maleic acid. E-peroxone process was found the most cost effective process with 0.0032 kWh g(-1) specific energy consumption. (C) 2017 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [115Y732]
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank Yeojen Company (Turkey) for the endowment of ozone generator to this work. This research is supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey with the grant number: 115Y732.
dc.identifier.doi10.1149/2.0431709jes
dc.identifier.endpageE186
dc.identifier.issn0013-4651
dc.identifier.issn1945-7111
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4229-0408
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85042388647
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpageE180
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1149/2.0431709jes
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14854/6549
dc.identifier.volume164
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000413256400154
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElectrochemical Soc Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Electrochemical Society
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20251020
dc.subjectAdvanced Oxidation Processes
dc.subjectWaste-Water Treatment
dc.subjectElectrochemical Degradation
dc.subjectLandfill Leachate
dc.subjectBromate Formation
dc.subjectDrinking-Water
dc.subjectOzonation
dc.subjectKinetics
dc.subjectOzone
dc.titleElectro-Peroxone Treatment of Phenol: Process Comparison, the Effect of Operational Parameters and Degradation Mechanism
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar