Pruning artificial neural networks: An example using land cover classification of multi-sensor images [2]

dc.contributor.authorKavzoğlu, Taşkın
dc.contributor.authorMather, Paul M.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-29T12:08:03Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Harita Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.description.abstractThe use of three techniques for pruning artificial neural networks (magnitude-based pruning, optimum brain damage and optimal brain surgeon) is investigated, using microwave SAR and optical SPOT data to classify land cover in a test area located in eastern England. Results show that it is possible to reduce network size significantly without compromising overall classification accuracy; indeed, accuracy may rise as the number of links decreases. However, individual class accuracies and the spatial distribution of the pixels forming the individual classes may change significantly. If the network is pruned too severely some classes may be eliminated altogether. In terms of maintaining overall classification accuracy the optimal brain surgeon algorithm gave the best results, and magnitude-based pruning also gave good results despite its simplicity. The optimum brain damage algorithm performed least well of the three methods tested.; The use of three techniques for pruning artificial neural networks (magnitude-based pruning, optimum brain damage and optimal brain surgeon) is investigated, using microwave SAR and optical SPOT data to classify land cover in a test area located in eastern England. Results show that it is possible to reduce network size significantly without compromising overall classification accuracy; indeed, accuracy may rise as the number of links decreases. However, individual class accuracies and the spatial distribution of the pixels forming the individual classes may change significantly. If the network is pruned too severely some classes may be eliminated altogether. In terms of maintaining overall classification accuracy the optimal brain surgeon algorithm gave the best results, and magnitude-based pruning also gave good results despite its simplicity. The optimum brain damage algorithm performed least well of the three methods tested. © 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/014311699211796 [2]
dc.identifier.endpage2803
dc.identifier.isbn0850669014
dc.identifier.isbn0850669901
dc.identifier.issn0143-1161
dc.identifier.issn1366-5901
dc.identifier.issue14
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0033454031
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage2787
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/014311699211796 [2]
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14854/14279
dc.identifier.volume20
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Remote Sensing
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20251020
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectImage analysis
dc.subjectNeural networks
dc.subjectOptimization
dc.subjectSynthetic aperture radar
dc.subjectPruning artificial neural networks
dc.subjectRemote sensing
dc.subjectartificial neural network
dc.subjectland classification
dc.subjectland cover
dc.subjectsynthetic aperture radar
dc.subjectEngland
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.titlePruning artificial neural networks: An example using land cover classification of multi-sensor images [2]
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar