Comparative dynamic analysis of carbon, aramid and glass fiber reinforced interply and intraply hybrid composites

dc.contributor.authorAydin, Muhammet Raci
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorÇakır, Ferit
dc.contributor.authorGundogdu, Omer
dc.contributor.authorAkbulut, Hamit
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-29T11:29:36Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, İnşaat Bölümü
dc.description.abstractThis study presents a comparative dynamic analysis of hybrid composites, which are suitable for new technological vehicles and possess greater advantages over non-hybrid fiber-reinforced composites. In this context, nonhybrid (NH), interply hybrid (IN) and intraply hybrid (IR) composites are manufactured. In the manufacturing process, NH and IN composites are utilized by using Carbon (C), Aramid (A), and Glass (G) while IR composites are manufactured with Aramid-Carbon (AC), Carbon-Glass (CG), Glass-Aramid (GA). In the manufacturing stage, a variety of layer numbers and fiber orientation angles is taken into consideration to determine the most advantageous structures for vibration characteristics. As there are a great number of productions required because of the parameters of interest, Taguchi production design is used. These composites are manufactured using Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding (VARTM). In accordance with the relevant standards, density, tensile, and dynamic properties are determined experimentally. Further, numerical models are developed using the ANSYS (R) software, and modal analysis is conducted. The results of the numerical analysis are compared with the experimental results. Taguchi analyses are performed to determine the most effective manufacturing configurations for the purpose. Consequently, IN and IR composites with similar content are compared to each other and the previous literature. According to the experimental and numerical results, the factors most effective in determining the natural frequency and damping ratio are layer numbers, orientation angles, and fabric types, respectively. The effectiveness of each parameter in the ranking is determined by using Taguchi levels.
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [117M894]
dc.description.sponsorshipAtaturk University Scientific Research Projects (BAP) Coordination Unit [FDK-2017-6225]
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding This work was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project No: 117M894) and Ataturk University Scientific Research Projects (BAP) Coordination Unit (Project No: FDK-2017-6225) in Turkey.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115595
dc.identifier.issn0263-8223
dc.identifier.issn1879-1085
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85129502864
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115595
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14854/11177
dc.identifier.volume291
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000797217200003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Sci Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofComposite Structures
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20251020
dc.subjectHybrid composite
dc.subjectInterply
dc.subjectIntraply
dc.subjectHybridizations
dc.subjectNumerical analyses
dc.subjectVibration response
dc.titleComparative dynamic analysis of carbon, aramid and glass fiber reinforced interply and intraply hybrid composites
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar